As Israel seeks to take control of south Lebanon and establish a buffer zone, Bint Jbeil has become a key strategic and symbolic battlefield
On the eve of rare direct negotiations last week, the first in decades between Israel and Lebanon, Israeli forces said they had encircled the south Lebanon town of Bint Jbeil. Located just kilometres from the border with Israel, the town has become one of the most critical symbolic and strategic battlefields during the war, as Israel seeks to take control of south Lebanon and establish a buffer zone. Fierce close-range clashes have been ongoing for more than three weeks between Israeli forces and Hezbollah fighters, with Israel using airstrikes, artillery shelling, and white phosphorus to capture the key geographic site, once home to 30,000 people.
Bint Jbeil has witnessed some of the fiercest confrontations in the history of the conflict with Israel, particularly during the 2006 war, when Israel failed to capture it and suffered casualties. For Hezbollah, the town holds significant symbolic value due to its long history of resistance against Israeli occupation. It was in a local stadium that the group’s former secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, stood a day after the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon on 25 May 2000 to declare in his famous speech that “this Israel is weaker than a spider’s web”.
Symbolic and strategic importance “Bint Jbeil has historically been a central concern for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and forms part of his plan to establish a buffer zone in the south,” a local source told The New Arab. “The level of destruction is very high and can be observed via satellite imagery, as entry is not possible due to the occupation and ongoing clashes.” From a military perspective, taking control of Bint Jbeil has been central to Israel’s aims of advancing towards the Litani River, retired brigadier general Hisham Jaber, head of the Middle East Centre for Strategic and Military Studies, told The New Arab, making it one of the most important towns in south Lebanon.
“Israel’s control of Bint Jbeil would mean control of the main line in the central sector,” Jaber said, with Israel having aimed to use its advance towards the Litani River as leverage in negotiations. Occupying the towns of Bint Jbeil, Tebnine, Shamaa, Bayyada, and Labouneh would enable it to do so. Bint Jbeil forms a crossroads between the western and eastern sectors of the south, connecting to towns such as Markaba, Houla, and Mais al-Jabal, as well as Rmeish, Debel, Aita al-Shaab and Dhayra.
It also serves as a gateway to routes leading to the coast, as well as inland to Ghandourieh and Nabatieh. “The battle in this area is extremely difficult and intense, and Israel wants to advance and take control of it regardless of the cost, even if it incurs losses greater than those it suffered in 2006,” Jaber told TNA. Uncertain fate With a fragile ceasefire now in place, the town’s fate is uncertain.
On 13 April, Israel’s military claimed that its 98th Division had entirely encircled it as paratroopers, commando units, and the Givati Brigade continued expanding ground operations to capture the town. Emptied of its residents, local sources say it is surrounded by Israeli forces from multiple positions, including Yaroun, Tayri, Ain Ebel, and Aitaroun, with soldiers taking control of the government and Salah Ghandour hospitals. The stadium where Nasrallah made his infamous speech has also reportedly been captured, according to Israeli reports.
In satellite images published across Lebanese media, the town appears largely destroyed. On Saturday, meanwhile, Israeli forces reportedly carried out demolitions along border towns in south Lebanon, including Bint Jbeil, despite the ceasefire. As preparations begin for a second round of talks, Israel destroyed more residential buildings in the villages of Shamaa, Naqoura, and Bayyada in the Tyre district late Sunday into early Monday, while a strike also hit Tayri village in the Bint Jbeil district.
“Israel is not prepared to waste time sitting with Lebanon at the negotiating table before achieving gains on the ground. It wants to bring Lebanon to negotiations exhausted and without leverage to sign a surrender document,” Jaber told TNA. On Sunday, Israel’s military published a map showing its "forward defence line" in south Lebanon, effectively declaring a ‘Yellow Line’ similar to the one in Gaza that has annexed 58% of the Palestinian territory.
It stretches 5-10 km into south Lebanon and would form the basis of its planned buffer zone in the country, bringing dozens of villages, including Bint Jbeil, under Israeli control. It is unclear, however, if Israel has full operational control of the town or what the status of remaining Hezbollah fighters is. Israel has refused to say whether Lebanese civilians who fled the fighting in the proposed buffer zone will ever be allowed to return to their homes. With more talks between Israeli and Lebanese officials planned, Jaber says that Beirut’s most important source of leverage is the 1949 Armistice Agreement, signed under UN auspices, which
