The tender, which closed on October 28, 2025, saw one bidder, M/s Qaim, declared non-responsive due to discrepancies in documentation and alleged non-compliance with specified requirements. The firm challenged the decision before the Grievance Redressal Committee and later approached PPRA, which observed that the procurement appeared to be structured for foreign bidders. TIP said this raises legal concerns, noting that limiting participation to foreign suppliers may violate the Public Procurement Rules 2004 and undermine policies supporting local industry.

The organisation stated that such actions fall under Rule 50 of the PPRA Rules, which defines unauthorised breaches of procurement procedures as mis-procurement. It added that Rule 24 requires fair competition and encourages preference for domestic suppliers, while relevant policies mandate value addition or price preference for local manufacturers. TIP also criticised PPRA for not formally declaring the case as mis-procurement despite identifying irregularities.

The watchdog recommended that the tender be cancelled and re-issued in line with procurement laws, and called for enforcement of Integrity Pact provisions in case violations are confirmed. It further urged action against officials responsible for the alleged irregularities under applicable laws. The letter has been shared with multiple authorities, including the Prime Minister’s Office, Petroleum Division, National Accountability Bureau, and Federal Investigation Agency. TIP said it acted as a whistleblower organisation in the matter, emphasising the need for transparency and compliance with procurement rules.