Veterans of the Nigerian Armed Forces have faulted the Arewa Youth Assembly for Good Leadership (AYAGL) over its intervention in matters relating to the Military Pensions Board (MPB), describing the group’s role as lacking credibility and competence. In a rejoinder signed by Mamman Danjuma for the Veterans Care Forum, the stakeholders said although AYAGL had withdrawn its earlier criticism of the MPB, its latest statement still raised “fundamental issues of credibility, accountability, and institutional integrity.” The veterans queried the basis of AYAGL’s engagement with the MPB. “What informed AYAGL’s fact-finding mission to the MPB?

Who authorized or mandated AYAGL to engage the MPB? What institutional role qualifies AYAGL to inquire into a specialized military pension body? What professional competence does AYAGL possess in military pension administration?” the statement asked.

They expressed concern over AYAGL’s sudden reversal of position, noting that it suggested “reactive advocacy, not informed engagement.” The rejoinder further questioned whether external interests influenced the youth group’s initial stance and subsequent retraction. The veterans stressed that the matter is already before the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and a court of competent jurisdiction, insisting that it is not the role of a regional or youth group to mount public defense or prosecution. Clarifying their position, the forum said veterans are not advocating for any individual but for principles and representation.

“He who wears the shoe knows where it pinches,” the statement read, adding that only those who have served understand retirement transition, delayed entitlements, healthcare challenges, and post-service welfare gaps. They cited global best practices in countries such as the USA, UK, Pakistan, South Africa, India, and Canada, where veterans play central roles in managing post-service welfare. While acknowledging that appointments to the MPB are the prerogative of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the veterans urged that national interest should guide such decisions, with emphasis on stakeholder realities.

The statement also questioned AYAGL’s priorities, asking why the group had not spoken on pressing security issues such as troop deployment, equipment, and welfare in theatres of operation. The veterans maintained that the issue is not about personalities but about principle, representation, and institutional integrity. “Public discourse must be responsible, informed, and respectful of due process. Welfare of those who served must remain paramount, guided by experience, dignity, and globally accepted best practices,” the statement added.