Discrepancies between real-world driving range and the figures advertised by car brands have varied significantly in the latest testing. Results have been released for 17 more electric, petrol, and diesel vehicles – from the BYD Sealion 7 to the Toyota LandCruiser – put through their paces in government-funded real-world efficiency testing to see how they match up to advertised figures. The GWM Haval Jolion Hybrid recorded the biggest variance from manufacturers’ quoted efficiencies in the testing by the Australian Automobile Association (AAA), finding it was 27 per cent less efficient than advertised.
The Haval Jolion Hybrid used 6.5 litres of fuel per hundred kilometres, more than the 5.1 litres reported in GWM’s lab testing, while the Audi Q5 and GWM Haval H6 Hybrid were both 19 per cent less efficient than claimed. Other petrol and hybrid vehicles tested that used notably more fuel than claimed were the Kia K4 (15 per cent), Honda ZR-V (10 per cent), MG QS (9 per cent), and Mazda CX-60 (5 per cent). MORE: Real-world car efficiency testing disputed by car industry lobby group The Real-World Testing Program tested an Audi Q5 TFSI 150kW with a 2.0-litre turbo-petrol engine.
The Kia Sorento Hybrid only varied by two per cent from its claimed efficiency, while the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Subaru Forester AWD were actually more efficient than claimed, using 2 per cent and 1 per cent less fuel, respectively, in the real-world tests. Of the four electric vehicles tested, the BYD Dolphin’s real-world range was the most reduced, at 24 per cent lower than quoted. This reduced the Dolphins’ real-world range by 97km compared to lab testing, from 410km to 313km.
However, as reported by Drive, the AAA has used the driving range claim tested under lenient NEDC protocols, as on the windscreen sticker, rather than the more realistic WLTP rating, which is more commonly promoted by the manufacturer. Compared to the Dolphin’s 345km WLTP range rating, the real-world result is only 9 per cent lower than quoted. MORE: Electric cars miss mark on advertised driving range by up to 31 per cent BYD Dolphin Essential.
BYD’s Sealion 7 SUV also recorded a significant variance between lab results and real-world testing, with the AAA testing finding its range was 17 per cent lower than its NEDC claim, or 3 per cent lower than WLTP. The real-world range of the MG S5 and Kia EV5 was respectively 6 per cent and 3 per cent lower than lab results. All three diesel vehicles tested used more fuel than quoted by manufacturers: the Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series (4 per cent higher), Ford Tourneo (5 per cent higher), and MG U9 (9 per cent higher).
MORE: Electric cars revealed to be overstating range ratings by as much as 23 per cent in real-world testing Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series. AAA Managing Director Michael Bradley said in a media statement that the current fuel crisis has placed importance on the accuracy of a car’s claimed consumption. “Now more than ever, it’s critical that Australian consumers know exactly how much fuel a car will actually use, how much they will cost to run, or how far they will go on a single charge,” Bradley said.
“The current fuel crisis has heightened awareness that carmakers are highly incentivised to build cars that perform very well in the laboratory test used to regulate vehicle emissions, but that most of these same cars perform very differently when driven in the real-world. “Australian car buyers are right to be deeply sceptical of the fuel consumption information carmakers are providing, and this Program is playing a critical role in helping Australian businesses and families save money.” The AAA regularly tests new vehicles and publishes the results. You can view real-world efficiency for previously tested vehicles on its website here.
The AAA’s testing uses a 90km-long circuit near Geelong, Victoria, which encompasses both inner-city and freeway driving. Petrol and hybrid vehicle AAA real-world efficiency testing results CategoryModelFuel Result VarianceRWT Fuel Result (L/100km)Lab Fuel Result (L/100km)Small carKia K4 2.0-litre hatch+15%7.06.1Small SUVGWM Haval Jolion Hybrid+27%6.55.1Medium SUVAudi Q5 TFSI 150kW mild hybrid+19%7.05.9Medium SUVGWM Haval H6 Hybrid+19%6.25.2Medium SUVHonda ZR-V petrol+10%7.77.0Medium SUVMazda CX-60 G40e mild-hybrid+5%7.87.4Medium SUVSubaru Forester AWD petrol-1%7.87.9Large SUVChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max-2%8.68.7Large SUVKia Sorento Hybrid+2%5.85.7Large SUVMG QS FWD+9%9.18.4 Electric vehicle AAA real-world efficiency testing results CategoryModelRange VarianceRWT Calculated Range (km)Lab Range on Windscreen Sticker (km)Medium carBYD Dolphin Essential-24% vs NEDC-9% vs WLTP313km410km (NEDC)345km (WLTP)Small SUVMG S5 EV Essence 62-6% vs WLTP399km425km (WLTP)Medium SUVBYD Sealion 7 Premium-17% vs NEDC-3% vs WLTP469km576km (NEDC)482km (WLTP)Medium SUVKia EV5 Air Long Range-3% vs WLTP537km555km (WLTP) Diesel vehicle AAA real-world efficiency testing results CategoryModelFuel Result Var